This page was rebuilt 09/10/2026 11:10 a.m. Central. Every entry also carries when this record learned it.
Recent court activity
Docket entries from every court this record watches, newest first,
copied word for word and published automatically. Nothing here is summarised or
interpreted; the written account of what these entries mean is on the
status and timeline page, and a person writes it.
A row with no clock time is shown at the end of its day: these courts stamp a
time on documents they receive and publish none for orders they issue.
Updated 09/10/2026 11:10 a.m. Central.
- 09/10/2026 · U.S. Supreme Court · 26A326
Application (26A326) referred to the Court.
- 09/10/2026 · U.S. Supreme Court · 26A326
Application (26A326) for stay presented to Justice Kavanaugh and by him referred to the Court is granted. The September 8, 2026 order entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in case No. 4:26–cv–1424 is stayed pending the disposition of the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari in this Court, if such a writ is timely sought. Should certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court.
- 09/10/2026 at 10:00 a.m. · U.S. Supreme Court · 26A326
Response to application from respondent Congressman Robert "Bob" Onder, et al. filed. [at 10:03 AM]
- 09/10/2026 at 9:32 a.m. · U.S. Supreme Court · 26A326
Response to application from respondent Missouri and Denny Hoskins, in his official capacity as Missouri Secretary of State filed.
- 09/10/2026 at 9:26 a.m. · U.S. Supreme Court · 26A326
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
- 09/10/2026 at 5:40 a.m. · U.S. Supreme Court · 26A326
Amicus brief of Jake Maggard and Gregg Lombardi submitted.
- 09/09/2026 · U.S. Supreme Court · 26A326
Response to application (26A326) from by Justice Kavanaugh, due by 10 a.m. (EDT) on September 10, 2026.
- 09/09/2026 · Federal District Court (E.D. Mo.)
ORDER: No profit would be gained by upsetting the federalism and comity principles at hand, and the Court need not reach the other issues raised in the instant motion. The Court therefore denies the Defendant's 41 Motion to Enjoin the Missouri Supreme Court Pursuant to the All Writs Act. The Court denies Defendant's 42 motion to expedite as moot. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 9/9/2026. (CLL) (Entered: 09/09/2026)
- 09/09/2026 · Federal District Court (E.D. Mo.)
ORDER: Accordingly, the Court denies Intervenor-Defendants' 38 Emergency Application for Stay. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 9/9/2026. (CLL) (Entered: 09/09/2026)
- 09/09/2026 · Federal District Court (E.D. Mo.)
REPLY to Response to Motion re 41 MOTION for Writ (Motion to Enjoin Missouri Supreme Court Pursuant to the All Writs Act) filed by Defendants Denny Hoskins, State of Missouri. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Capozzi, Louis) (Entered: 09/09/2026)
- 09/09/2026 · Federal District Court (E.D. Mo.)
MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 41 MOTION for Writ (Motion to Enjoin Missouri Supreme Court Pursuant to the All Writs Act) filed by Intervenor Defendants People Not Politicians, Richard von Glahn. (Root, Jeremy) (Entered: 09/09/2026)
- 09/09/2026 · Federal District Court (E.D. Mo.)
ORDER of USCA: The motion for a stay pending appeal is denied because we either lack jurisdiction over the appeal or, based on the briefing we have so far, the stay factors have not been met. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 425-26 (2009); see also In re Rutledge, 956 F.3d 1018, 1026 (8th Cir. 2020) (explaining that "we... ordinarily lack jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory appeal from the district court's grant... of a TRO"). The motion for summary reversal is also denied, and the motion for an administrative stay is denied as moot. USCA Appeal #: 26-2797 (ANR) (Entered: 09/09/2026)
- 09/09/2026 · Federal District Court (E.D. Mo.)
ORDER: Accordingly, the Court orders Intervenor-Defendants to, no later than 5:00 p.m. Central Daylight Time on September 9, 2026, file their response to Hoskins's Motion to Enjoin the Missouri Supreme Court Pursuant to the All Writs Act, doc. 41. (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS). Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 9/9/2026. (CLL) (Entered: 09/09/2026)
- 09/09/2026 · Federal District Court (E.D. Mo.)
SUPPLEMENTAL Exhibits by Defendants Denny Hoskins, State of Missouri re 43 Memorandum in Support of Motion : (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B)(Capozzi, Louis) Modified on 9/10/2026 to edit text of entry from notice of filing with clerk's office to supplemental (ANR). (Entered: 09/09/2026)
- 09/09/2026 · Federal District Court (E.D. Mo.)
MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re 41 MOTION for Writ (Motion to Enjoin Missouri Supreme Court Pursuant to the All Writs Act) filed by Defendants Denny Hoskins, State of Missouri. (Capozzi, Louis) (Entered: 09/09/2026)
- 09/09/2026 · Federal District Court (E.D. Mo.)
MOTION to Expedite Consideration of Defendants' Motion to Enjoin by Defendants Denny Hoskins, State of Missouri. (Capozzi, Louis) (Entered: 09/09/2026)
- 09/09/2026 · Federal District Court (E.D. Mo.)
MOTION for Writ (Motion to Enjoin Missouri Supreme Court Pursuant to the All Writs Act) by Defendants Denny Hoskins, State of Missouri. (Capozzi, Louis) (Entered: 09/09/2026)
- 09/09/2026 · Federal District Court (E.D. Mo.)
INITIAL NOTIFICATION FROM COA; USCA Appeal #: 26-2797 (ANR) (Entered: 09/09/2026)
- 09/09/2026 · Federal District Court (E.D. Mo.)
Filing fee received: $ 605.00, receipt number 29607, for Notice of Appeal (JWD)
- 09/09/2026 · Federal District Court (E.D. Mo.)
NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by clerk to USCA regarding 35 Memorandum & Order. Notice of Appeal filed on 9/8/26 by Intervenor Defendant Richard von Glahn. NOTIFICATION TO COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTY: FILE REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT WITH DISTRICT COURT CLERKS OFFICE.(JWD) (Entered: 09/09/2026)
- 09/09/2026 · Missouri Supreme Court · SC101805
Suggestions Regarding Contempt; Appendix; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
- 09/09/2026 · Missouri Supreme Court · SC101805
Order issued: Respondent's motion for leave to file out of time sustained.
- 09/09/2026 · Missouri Supreme Court · SC101805
Motion for Leave to File Out of Time; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
- 09/09/2026 · Missouri Supreme Court · SC101805
Response to Order to Show Cause; Exhibit A - Complaint; Exhiit B - TRO; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
- 09/09/2026 · Missouri Supreme Court · SC101805
CAUSE DOCKETED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON SEPTEMBER 10, 2026 AT 10:00 AM. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DOCKET LETTER, DOCKET, AND NOTICE TO COUNSEL. COUNSEL ARGUING BEFORE THE COURT MUST SIGN IN WITH THE DEPUTY CLERK IN THE COURTROOM NO LATER THAN 9:45 AM.
- 09/09/2026 · Missouri Supreme Court · SC101805
Marshal's Return
- 09/09/2026 · Missouri Supreme Court · SC101805
Entry of Appearance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
- 09/09/2026 · Missouri Supreme Court · SC101805
Entry of Appearance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
- 09/09/2026 · Missouri Supreme Court · SC101805
Entry of Appearance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
- 09/09/2026 at 9:10 p.m. · U.S. Supreme Court · 26A326
Amicus brief of Campaign Legal Center, American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri Foudation, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation submitted.
- 09/09/2026 at 4:58 p.m. · U.S. Supreme Court · 26A326
Application (26A326) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
- 09/09/2026 at 03:16 p.m. · Eighth Circuit
JUDGE ORDER: The motion for a stay [5681035-2] pending appeal is denied because we either lack jurisdiction over the appeal or, based on the briefing we have so far, the stay factors have not been met. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 425–26 (2009); see also In re Rutledge, 956 F.3d 1018, 1026 (8th Cir. 2020) (explaining that “we . . . ordinarily lack jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory appeal from the district court’s grant . . . of a TRO”). The motion [5681061-2] for summary reversal is also denied, and the motion for an administrative stay is denied as moot. JAMES B. LOKEN, DAVID R. STRAS and JUSTIN D. SMITH Adp Sep 2026 [5681557] [26-2797] (EDG) [Entered: 09/09/2026 03:16 PM]
- 09/09/2026 at 10:17 a.m. · Eighth Circuit
UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 26-2797: paid - cs] Fee paid to district court on 9/9/26, receipt #29607. 5681274 [26-2797] (EDG) [Entered: 09/09/2026 10:17 AM]
- 09/09/2026 at 10:17 a.m. · Eighth Circuit
UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 26-2797: paid - cs] Fee paid to district court on 9/9/26 #29607. 5681274 [26-2797] (EDG) [Entered: 09/09/2026 10:17 AM]
- 09/09/2026 at 10:09 a.m. · Eighth Circuit
CLERK LETTER sent regarding new caption in case. [5681260] [26-2797] (EDG) [Entered: 09/09/2026 10:09 AM]
- 09/09/2026 at 09:31 a.m. · Eighth Circuit
APPEARANCE filed by Alexander C. Barrett for Appellants Richard Von Glahn and People Not Politicians w/service 09/09/2026 [5681204] [26-2797] (ACB) [Entered: 09/09/2026 09:31 AM]
- 09/09/2026 at 09:24 a.m. · Eighth Circuit
APPEARANCE filed by Graham D. Miller for Not Party Denny L. Hoskins and State of Missouri w/service 09/09/2026 [5681194] [26-2797] (GDM) [Entered: 09/09/2026 09:24 AM]
- 09/09/2026 at 09:21 a.m. · Eighth Circuit
APPEARANCE filed by J. Michael Patton for Not Party Denny L. Hoskins and State of Missouri w/service 09/09/2026 [5681188] [26-2797] (JMP) [Entered: 09/09/2026 09:21 AM]
- 09/09/2026 at 09:16 a.m. · Eighth Circuit
APPEARANCE filed by Louis J. Capozzi, III for Not Party Denny L. Hoskins and State of Missouri w/service 09/09/2026 [5681176] [26-2797] (LJC) [Entered: 09/09/2026 09:16 AM]
- 09/09/2026 at 09:03 a.m. · Eighth Circuit
APPEARANCE filed by Stephanie S. Bell for Appellees Richard Ray Brattin, Debra Havens, Robert Onder and Patricia Thomas w/service 09/08/2026 [5681162] [26-2797] (CDB) [Entered: 09/09/2026 09:03 AM]